Skip Navigation


Social Science Japan Journal Advance Access originally published online on May 28, 2009
Social Science Japan Journal 2009 12(2):195-209; doi:10.1093/ssjj/jyp020
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
12/2/195    most recent
jyp020v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kazuyo, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Social Science Japan Journal 12:195-209 (2009)
© 2009 Oxford University Press

Past and Present Constraints on Labor Movements for Gender Equality in Japan

YAMADA Kazuyo

YAMADA Kazuyo is an associate professor in the Faculty of Economics, Shiga University. She specializes in Japanese labor history, especially labor movements and wage systems, from a gender perspective. She can be reached at Faculty of Economics, Shiga University, 1-1-1 Banba, Hikone City, Shiga 522-8522, Japan, or by e-mail at yamada{at}biwako.shiga-u.ac.jp

The purpose of this paper is to compare the obstacles Japan's representative national trade union centers, Sohyo and Rengo, faced in their efforts to achieve gender-equal employment and to illustrate how they coped with these obstacles at the time of the enactment of the Equal Employment Opportunity Law in 1985 and at the time of its revision in 2006, through a detailed analysis of primary materials. Thanks to the 1997 revision, labor movements today are free from the dilemma of having to choose either ‘protection’ or ‘equality’ for women. Given this, I argue that the labor movements should now step up their efforts to achieve equality. In order to take a step toward the realization of gender equality and to forge a new solidarity by bridging the chasm that divides the labor movements in different employment categories, reconstructing the present framework of the categories of ‘regular’ and ‘non-regular’ workers is of utmost importance to labor movements.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.