Skip Navigation


Social Science Japan Journal Advance Access originally published online on October 12, 2009
Social Science Japan Journal 2009 12(2):267-275; doi:10.1093/ssjj/jyp031
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
12/2/267    most recent
jyp031v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shunsuke, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Social Science Japan Journal 12:267-275 (2009)
© 2009 Oxford University Press


Survey Article

An Exploratory Analysis of National Prestige Scores

TANABE Shunsuke*

TANABE Shunsuke is an associate professor at the Institute of Social Science, University of Tokyo. His research focuses on national identity and Japanese cognitions of nations. His recent publications include: ‘"Nihonjin" no Gaikoku Kokando to Sono Kozo no Jisshuteki Kento: Ajia Shugi, Tozai Reisen, Gurobarizeeshon’ (An Empirical Assessment of "Japanese" Cognition Toward Various Nations: Asianism, the Cold War, and Globalization), Shakaigaku Hyoron (Japanese Sociological Review) 59(2): 369–387 (September 2008); and Nashionaru Aidentiti- no Kokusai Hikaku (International Comparative Analysis of National Identity), Tokyo: Keio Gijukudaigaku Shuppankai (2009). He can be reached at the Institute of Social Science, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan, or by e-mail at tanabe{at}iss.u-tokyo.ac.jp

The purpose of this study is to develop a national prestige score by emulating occupational prestige scores and to analyze how Japanese people perceive the prestige of various countries. The results of my analysis show that the overall ranking of national prestige is consistent with prior research that measured preferences toward nations, e.g. Western countries are evaluated more highly than African or Middle Eastern countries. Furthermore, while prior studies on ‘preference’ indicated relatively low positions for neighboring countries such as China, South Korea and Russia, this study found that they were ranked in the mid-range, regarding their prestige. I also examined the validity and reliability of the national prestige scores, with the following findings: first, a comparative analysis between national prestige and national preference revealed conceptual differences between prestige and preference and the external validity of a nation's prestige score. Second, in order to assess the reliability of the scores, I analyzed differences based on gender, educational level and age group. However, those attributes did not make any notable differences in terms of the overall ranking of nations.


* Translated from the Japanese by Lili Selden. I would like to express my gratitude to Lili Selden who translated my first Japanese draft into English and I also want to thank Hiro Saito and Emi Tamaki who checked many English phrases in later drafts. I remain fully responsible for any mistakes or misunderstandings in this paper.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.